Register    Login    Search    FAQ   Arcade 

Welcome
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, register and join our community today

When posting to this forum you agree to the following conditions

a-
you shall not use the Sites or the Interactive Services to transmit or knowingly or recklessly receive (or knowingly or recklessly authorise or permit any other person to receive or transmit) material which is obscene, threatening, menacing, offensive, defamatory, abusive, in breach of confidence, in breach of any intellectual property right (including copyright) or otherwise violates any applicable law or regulation or code, or which makes excessive demands for bandwidth or contains any virus or which may otherwise impair or harm this forum or any third party computer system.

b -
In view of the vast flow of information transmitted via this forum each day, it is not technically possible nor economically feasible to monitor all materials that pass through the system (including, without limitation, all views and/or comments therein). Hawkwind believes that the onus for ensuring that material presented on the Internet is legal rests with the original content provider, and we will not limit access to material unless notified that it is illegal. Notwithstanding, Hawkwind shall have the right to remove any items it believes may be illegal.


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 785 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 49, 50, 51, 52, 53
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: WWIII
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 4:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 3876
indeed and true! - if memory serves the US had a good hand in bailing the situation out - was that example the exception or the rule? - e.g. saddam hussein being put in by the US against the ayatolltah? - blair shaking gadaffi's hand (oil) and numerous examples - appeasement and other words can be euphemism's too once an agenda is there


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WWIII
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 5:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 2:16 am
Posts: 4752
Location: Northwest Arctic Circle
the way I see things in regard to Sadaam H. is that [U.S.] armed their enemy's enemy, to acheive a very short-sighted (certainly in retrospect) goal ~ unfortunately the repercussions of that are still tipping the dominoes to this very day. Propping up Pahlavi in Iran was [the American government's] first mistake, though that is not to say that militant radical jihadists wouldn't have found some other reasons to hate America. If one considers the power-mongering nature of radical Islam (read history of Muhammad ) one might reasonably predict that had the U.S stayed completely out of Middle East affairs from the start, that a scenario in which jihadists gained control of the world's energy supply would have turned ugly no matter how the tiles tumble.

There is not, nor can there ever be, peaceful coexistence with radical Islam ~ not when Jihadi ideology is one of abject disdain for human rights that embraces a summary rejection of all civil decency.   The Jihadists and their manifesto of dominance and destruction are a pestilence which must be eradicated without delay.
At the first sign of termites, the thing you do is to call in an exterminator, you don't wait until the structure collapses ~ by then it's too late.

_________________
The Question Is The Answer


Last edited by vikmarlo on Wed Mar 08, 2017 9:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WWIII
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 5:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 3876
indeed Vik and agree - radicalism (although I retain my own way of thinking - no harm to anyone else, it's personal - my thinking seems to go against the system - if you loose your passive opinion/passion you have nothing - but I always state me case!) - case out the galway/tuam scenario here - mass graves - in the name of the faltering catholic church - i still take the eucharistic but some people made a right mess - they should have owned up - eli eli


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WWIII
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 6:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 2:16 am
Posts: 4752
Location: Northwest Arctic Circle
to that I can only ponder what might be.

opinion/passion; not necessarily inseparable.

opinions are merely viewpoints, which can change quite easily, based on new information.

Faith on the other hand seems to me a far more deep-seated knowledge, not that one may not come to new awakenings or conversions, just that the 'opinion' as a viewpoint of worldly thought vs. faith as a spiritual wisdom are often at odds.

At some point, one makes the real choice whether to defend ones life, love, and liberty or to allow destruction at the hand of a predator.

Every living organism is imbued with a natural instinct toward self preservation. Given the fact of that very nature and the diversity of species this planet has hosted, it occurs to me this is the only explanation for why you and I are even here in the first place.

[Edit] :

For the record, my own faith does not preclude self-defence.

_________________
The Question Is The Answer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WWIII
PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 2:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 2:16 am
Posts: 4752
Location: Northwest Arctic Circle
From United Press International :

escalating developments in Syria pose threat of global war in Middle East

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/Voices/2017 ... 490628104/

Israel's airstrike on Syria spooks Middle East

By Nicholas Blanford 
March 27, 2017 at 11:48 AM

Spoiler:
BEIRUT, March 27 (UPI) --
(excerpt)

 Israeli warplanes carrying out airstrikes on a shipment of Iranian arms to Lebanese Hezbollah guerrillas in Syria managed to evade Syrian air-defense missiles but the incident is a graphic demonstration of how the war has the potential to further inflame the region.

There are likely to be further Israeli airstrikes against Hezbol­lah in Syria, reflecting deepening Israeli concerns that Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps and their Lebanese ally are establish­ing a new front on the divided Go­lan Heights from which to fight the Jewish state.

These developments are increas­ing the chances of a miscalculation that could trigger a war that both sides insist they do not want. As tensions mount amid an unprece­dented cluster of interlocking con­flicts across the hair-trigger region, clashes like the aerial action over Palmyra could easily escalate out of control.

 The Israeli airstrikes climaxed after weeks of verbal threats from all sides, aggravated originally by the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump vowing to roll back Iran's influence across the Middle East.

Israel has signaled repeatedly that it would not allow Iran to es­tablish a permanent presence in Syria nor permit Hezbollah to ob­tain game-changing weapons, such as advanced air-defense systems, anti-ship missiles and long-range guided missiles.

Israel first launched airstrikes against suspected Hezbollah arms consignments in January 2013. Since then there have been at least 19 airstrikes, most of them in the Damascus area and further north in the Qalamoun region where there are a large number of Syrian mili­tary bases, including missile sites.

Israel's March 16 operation, involving four jet fighters, was its deepest strike inside Syria since 2013. The Israeli jets flew north over Lebanon's Bekaa Valley, Hez­bollah's heartland, before entering Syrian air space and launching sev­eral missiles, reportedly at a con­voy carrying unspecified weapons for Hezbollah.

The target was in the Palmyra area of northeastern Syria and several reports claimed the convoy originated from the T-4 airbase at Tiyas, west of the oasis town. In response, Syria launched at least four anti-aircraft missiles, believed to be relatively antiquated Russian-built SA-5s.

Syria claimed one aircraft was shot down and another damaged. Israel insisted all four aircraft re­turned safely.



Unusually, Israel deployed an Ar­row anti-missile system for the first time in a combat situation to shoot down a Syrian missile that entered Israeli airspace. Fragments of the Arrow missile, which is designed to shoot down ballistic missiles at high altitudes, landed inside Jor­dan.

This, along with the air raid si­rens and sound of explosions in the night sky above Jerusalem, ap­parently compelled Israel to pub­licly admit for the first time that its aircraft had struck targets inside Syria.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made no secret that there may be more such attacks.

"When we identify attempts to transfer advanced arms to Hezbol­lah and we have intelligence in­formation and we have the opera­tional plan, we act to prevent it," he said. "That's what happened and that's what will happen."

 

(end excerpt)

_________________
The Question Is The Answer


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 785 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 49, 50, 51, 52, 53

Board index » Test category 1 » Any Other Business


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Donate Now
Donate Now

cron
suspicion-preferred